Will these discs be able to be written on by regular DVD writers? If so then we can put four DVD-9's on one AOD! How awesome would that be...
Euro
10.5.2003 11:06 #1
No way, Euro. NO WAY.
They are vastly different formats.
10.5.2003 12:03 #2
But it says that it's physically compatible with current DVD format. Do you mean that regular DVD writers are not able to write to them but that these discs are playable in regular DVD players?
Euro
10.5.2003 12:17 #3
instead of getting peoples guesses on items like this. lets just wait and see. we will not know the answer till its released
10.5.2003 14:23 #4
The EE Times announcement doesn't give enough information. "Compatible with current DVD format" is a phrase you should take with a grain of salt. You may be able to play a present-day DVD on this system, but there's _no way_ a present day DVD burner is going to burn a dual-layered <A>dvanced <O>ptical <D>isc !!!
11.5.2003 00:05 #5
The compatible means downwards compatible -- i.e. discs are same size and AOD players (just like Blu-Ray players/recorders) can _play_ DVD-Video discs. Just like DVD players can play CDs, but your CD player can't play DVDs.
11.5.2003 00:31 #6
Great Googly-Moogly! It's 5:34 AM Nova Scotia time, and you caught my post.
(I gues great minds never get much sleep, eh dRD?) :)
(I know, I know), It's a dirty job, but someone's gotta do it.
Don't forget to occassionally reply to the 'ban-request-thread', even if you don't agree with a particular request. (Thankee).
- Mike, the insomniatic Klingon - (actually, I just crawled out of bed).
11.5.2003 00:38 #7
Quote:Will these discs be able to be written on by regular DVD writers? If so then we can put four DVD-9's on one AOD! How awesome would that be...No.. For starters AOD uses 405nm (violet) laser. AOD needs an AOD drive to read/record the discs. I do see how my post can be misleading -- I should have underlined the difference between physical compatibility and logical compatibility.
The physical similarities between AOD and DVD are: same lens aperture (0.60-0.65 for DVD, 0.65 for AOD), same protective layer thickness (0.6mm), and the same free working distance (1.0mm). The specs for BluRay are accordingly: 0.85, 0.1mm, and 0.05-0.10mm. AOD discs, like DVDs, are used without a cartridge. BluRay uses a cartridge.
11.5.2003 06:04 #8
US Patented UV/Blue Holographic nanoStorage
will hold > 4,000 Blu-Ray disks.
Holographic Storage technologies will
start displacing other optical storage
technologies so we can have one format,
one drive type, one interface.
Keep an eye out as this technology starts
to appear in the next few years.
http://www.colossalstorage.net
11.5.2003 09:24 #9
Quote:BluRay uses a cartridge. What? I hate those things. Why does it need a cartridge?
11.5.2003 09:37 #10
Quote:What? I hate those things. Why does it need a cartridge?Probably to keep the surface of the disc dust and finger print free. A big, greasy thumbprint is bad news at BluRay data density. I don't have a clue how AOD addresses read errors.
11.5.2003 10:40 #11
AOD likely uses some heavy Forward Error Correction similar to Satellite systems to protect against noise (dirt). It's hard to believe that even the current CD standard uses three levels of forward error correction. Not to sure for DVD's, but AOD would certainly need to use some severe FEC as from what I can see, one spec of dust could potentially cover the area of 1,000's of physically written bits and maybe over 1 million bits for a small fingerprint.
12.5.2003 12:36 #12
They will initially be in a case, and then be available without I presume. Just like DVD RAM.
16.5.2003 06:20 #13