Thin is in!
17.3.2008 17:47 #1
Dang, that's pretty thin and as someone else stated, "thin is in."
17.3.2008 19:00 #2
huuh? thats not true....i got a real cheap westing house and its thickest point is 6cm, the rest is 2cm thick!~thats great for ben buts a record that wont be kept!
you buy for price+performance(quality, pixels)+good brand+size= a good buy
-tripplite
17.3.2008 21:29 #3
why does it need to be that thin? The stand alone will take up more space.
Reminds me of the idiots who buy a flatscreen, then put the flatscreen on an entertainment center . . .
17.3.2008 23:48 #4
looks nice wonder what the res is
bet it will have a price tag of 459.00
Samsung make some great montiors also
18.3.2008 02:18 #5
Inspired by A B-2 Bomber does that mean with this monitor my illiagle P2P activity will go unnoticed. and does it come with Mach 1 or 2.
Yeah im bored
18.3.2008 10:46 #6
Originally posted by tripplite: huuh? thats not true....i got a real cheap westing house and its thickest point is 6cm, the rest is 2cm thick!~thats great for ben buts a record that wont be kept!
you buy for price+performance(quality, pixels)+good brand+size= a good buy
-trippliteOk...........6cm (1cm = 1/8 inch) so I highly doubt that your P.O.S. Westinghouse is that thin AT ITS THICKEST. Either way and doesn't matter.............WESTINGHOUSE IS CRAP!!! Poor, unreliable, and flat out garbage! I guess if one is poor and can't afford an extra 75 bucks for something that will last twice as long and provide twice the quality then it's alright. Take no offense to this as it's not directed at YOU personally. Westinghouse is just garbage and that is my expert view (not opinion).
18.3.2008 10:57 #7
Originally posted by gallagher: why does it need to be that thin? The stand alone will take up more space.
Reminds me of the idiots who buy a flatscreen, then put the flatscreen on an entertainment center . . .Flat panels aren't solely meant for "wall hanging" you shmuck!! And by saying that you just called me, some friends and MANY MANY others in the world and idiot. Now you truly deserve a kick in the arse. Having flat panels on a table, wall cutout or ent. ctr. look great, save space and is practical...............more so compared to a wall hang with an articulating arm and rerouting electrical conduit behind the unit. You probably jacked yours up with cords hanging down below the tv looking like a company named "Fo brothas Instalashun"
18.3.2008 11:11 #8
I'm wondering how hot it runs being that thin.
18.3.2008 12:51 #9
Quote:Originally posted by tripplite: huuh? thats not true....i got a real cheap westing house and its thickest point is 6cm, the rest is 2cm thick!~thats great for ben buts a record that wont be kept!
you buy for price+performance(quality, pixels)+good brand+size= a good buy
-trippliteOk...........6cm (1cm = 1/8 inch) so I highly doubt that your P.O.S. Westinghouse is that thin AT ITS THICKEST. Either way and doesn't matter.............WESTINGHOUSE IS CRAP!!! Poor, unreliable, and flat out garbage! I guess if one is poor and can't afford an extra 75 bucks for something that will last twice as long and provide twice the quality then it's alright. Take no offense to this as it's not directed at YOU personally. Westinghouse is just garbage and that is my expert view (not opinion).Wow..ur a big dumb***....1 inch is 2.5 cm so 1 cm is 2/5 of an inch so 6cm comes to 2.4 inches....so its not as thin, but who cares....just next time u decide to open ur stupid mouth and decide to insult people, know what you are talking about..and also maybe retake grade 1 math again...this is my "expert view (not opinion)"
18.3.2008 14:38 #10
thats not so thin
18.3.2008 14:42 #11
Quote:Originally posted by tripplite: huuh? thats not true....i got a real cheap westing house and its thickest point is 6cm, the rest is 2cm thick!~thats great for ben buts a record that wont be kept!
you buy for price+performance(quality, pixels)+good brand+size= a good buy
-trippliteOk...........6cm (1cm = 1/8 inch) so I highly doubt that your P.O.S. Westinghouse is that thin AT ITS THICKEST. Either way and doesn't matter.............WESTINGHOUSE IS CRAP!!! Poor, unreliable, and flat out garbage! I guess if one is poor and can't afford an extra 75 bucks for something that will last twice as long and provide twice the quality then it's alright. Take no offense to this as it's not directed at YOU personally. Westinghouse is just garbage and that is my expert view (not opinion).wow youre dumb. you need to go back to school
18.3.2008 14:43 #12
Quote:Quote:Originally posted by tripplite: huuh? thats not true....i got a real cheap westing house and its thickest point is 6cm, the rest is 2cm thick!~thats great for ben buts a record that wont be kept!
you buy for price+performance(quality, pixels)+good brand+size= a good buy
-trippliteOk...........6cm (1cm = 1/8 inch) so I highly doubt that your P.O.S. Westinghouse is that thin AT ITS THICKEST. Either way and doesn't matter.............WESTINGHOUSE IS CRAP!!! Poor, unreliable, and flat out garbage! I guess if one is poor and can't afford an extra 75 bucks for something that will last twice as long and provide twice the quality then it's alright. Take no offense to this as it's not directed at YOU personally. Westinghouse is just garbage and that is my expert view (not opinion).Wow..ur a big dumb***....1 inch is 2.5 cm so 1 cm is 2/5 of an inch so 6cm comes to 2.4 inches....so its not as thin, but who cares....just next time u decide to open ur stupid mouth and decide to insult people, know what you are talking about..and also maybe retake grade 1 math again...this is my "expert view (not opinion)"My bad and THANKS FOR TAKING THE TIME TO LOOK THAT UP SO YOU COULD LOOK SMARTER.
I meant 1cm = 3/8 of an inch. TYPO you putz. At least I didn't have to look up. Already knew unlike you so my insult stands...........and is now directed at you ............GOOF!
18.3.2008 15:13 #13
Quote:Quote:Originally posted by tripplite: huuh? thats not true....i got a real cheap westing house and its thickest point is 6cm, the rest is 2cm thick!~thats great for ben buts a record that wont be kept!
you buy for price+performance(quality, pixels)+good brand+size= a good buy
-trippliteOk...........6cm (1cm = 1/8 inch) so I highly doubt that your P.O.S. Westinghouse is that thin AT ITS THICKEST. Either way and doesn't matter.............WESTINGHOUSE IS CRAP!!! Poor, unreliable, and flat out garbage! I guess if one is poor and can't afford an extra 75 bucks for something that will last twice as long and provide twice the quality then it's alright. Take no offense to this as it's not directed at YOU personally. Westinghouse is just garbage and that is my expert view (not opinion).Wow..ur a big dumb***....1 inch is 2.5 cm so 1 cm is 2/5 of an inch so 6cm comes to 2.4 inches....so its not as thin, but who cares....just next time u decide to open ur stupid mouth and decide to insult people, know what you are talking about..and also maybe retake grade 1 math again...this is my "expert view (not opinion)"Next time you and jetyi83 either bring a little artillery behind your attack or PIPE DOWN!! You only look like a bigger ass when pointing out(and attacking) a frakkin' TYPO. HA HA HA Would love the chance to school ya'!!
18.3.2008 15:18 #14
r0b0t3ch- i am no longer bored. plz continue with this very intersting argument.
18.3.2008 15:33 #15
Originally posted by DXR88: r0b0t3ch- i am no longer bored. plz continue with this very intersting argument.
This comment just made my day and people are wondering why I'm laughing my arse off at work! Unfortunately I gots no more. Said my piece and lettin' all the other comments roll in. Keep your peepers peeled as I'm sure one of those two will respond in kind by tomorrow. :)
18.3.2008 16:00 #16
Quote:Originally posted by DXR88: r0b0t3ch- i am no longer bored. plz continue with this very intersting argument.
This comment just made my day and people are wondering why I'm laughing my arse off at work! Unfortunately I gots no more. Said my piece and lettin' all the other comments roll in. Keep your peepers peeled as I'm sure one of those two will respond in kind by tomorrow. :)actually im gona respond right now, so keep laughing lol
@ r0b0t3ch
buddy, its not even 3/8..its 2/5 of an inch so you just made a dumb*** of yourself AGAIN!! The sad thing about this is that I am from Canada and don't even use the Imperial system. On the other hand, you should know the imperial system like the back of your hand..!
18.3.2008 16:12 #17
Originally posted by gallagher: why does it need to be that thin? The stand alone will take up more space.
Reminds me of the idiots who buy a flatscreen, then put the flatscreen on an entertainment center . . .
I would ask for an apology, you just called me an idiot, but I feel better being an idiot like me though,rather than a redneck like you!
18.3.2008 16:34 #18
HJAHHAHAHAHHAHAH....omg that cracks me up....this applies to me too cuz i have a flat screen as well but i have it on a stand along with all my dvd payers and digital boxes and it looks perfectly fine....OMG those pictures crack me up hahahah...u sure told him cyprusrom
18.3.2008 16:40 #19
Quote:Quote:Originally posted by DXR88: r0b0t3ch- i am no longer bored. plz continue with this very intersting argument.
This comment just made my day and people are wondering why I'm laughing my arse off at work! Unfortunately I gots no more. Said my piece and lettin' all the other comments roll in. Keep your peepers peeled as I'm sure one of those two will respond in kind by tomorrow. :)actually im gona respond right now, so keep laughing lol
@ r0b0t3ch
buddy, its not even 3/8..its 2/5 of an inch so you just made a dumb*** of yourself AGAIN!! The sad thing about this is that I am from Canada and don't even use the Imperial system. On the other hand, you should know the imperial system like the back of your hand..!Look Petah punkin eata..........GRAB A FRAKKIN ruler Canadian, eh! You being from there doesn't say much about you, your practicality or your state-of-mind and this is very apparent because you obviously havent looked at a ruler lately. 1cm = almost exactly 3/8. Your point is a little off and so is mine on the other direction. Both are plus/minus 5% margin of error but if you look at an actual ruler (that long skinny thing used to measure when you were a little girl in grade school) will show a Cm identical to 3/8. so Pipe down and argue something that actually makes a difference with a higher margin of error than 5%.
And Americans don't refer to it as the "Imperial system" so please............don't use that anymore.
You must be a French Canadian. Just as bad as the "Real French" themselves.
18.3.2008 16:44 #20
I just hate people like him(well, hate is a rather strong word-let's say dislike them, a lot:~)!) I assumed he/she lives in a decent setting, the following might be more appropriate, who knows:~)
18.3.2008 16:47 #21
LOL, good posts guys, keep them coming!
18.3.2008 16:52 #22
HAHAHHAHA...im actually laughing my ass off listening to us talk about this thing lol Eh? hahahaha lol....OK I agree with you its 3/8s lol This right here just made my day..hahah...ok u have good day r0b0t3ch
18.3.2008 16:53 #23
Oh yeah and I'm not french Canadian..I wasnt even born in Canada...im from Europe, Slovakia. ;)
OMg another good picture cyprusrom lmao
18.3.2008 16:56 #24
Yea, those pics are quite comical.
18.3.2008 17:00 #25
Originally posted by PetahG: Oh yeah and I'm not french Canadian..I wasnt even born in Canada...im from Europe, Slovakia. ;)
Hi neighbor- well, almost neighbors I should say, otherwise we get into another "3/8 of an inch" argument:~)!
18.3.2008 17:38 #26
r0b0t3ch-converting French Canadian to Europein Since 15:44.
Tis was a very interesting conversation Indeed.
18.3.2008 21:04 #27
Originally posted by cyprusrom: Originally posted by PetahG: Oh yeah and I'm not french Canadian..I wasnt even born in Canada...im from Europe, Slovakia. ;)
Hi neighbor- well, almost neighbors I should say, otherwise we get into another "3/8 of an inch" argument:~)!Hey where are u from? don'y worry we won't get into another argument, i promise
19.3.2008 03:19 #28
1 inch = 2.54cm
hence 1 cm = .40 inch
which = 2/5 of an inch
funni how ppl start being smart asses without even passing primary school maths
nice pics btw
19.3.2008 05:00 #29
r0b0t3ch, it's ok we all know that you are used to quoting things being a little bit larger than they actually are. It's messed up your perspective a little bit... Poor Man.
Has it worked for you yet?
On a positive note this is one of the most entertaining threads I have seen in long time. Nice work on the pics cyprusrom! I would say this thread even rates as entertaining as the hughjars vs. AfterDawn thread! Sadly it ended up in his passing away on AfterDawn. May he rest in peace... We will always remember him. We could always ask John Edward to communicate with hughjars so we can know what the next hugely successful format would be as he had such clarity in this department (that was NOT a punt at HD-DVD, I have nothing against that format... Woooo... Touchy subject!) :-P Ok... Way off topic now.
I wonder if this thread will result in the passing of another member. We can only wait to find out...
I vote for a gallagher vs. r0b0t3ch post off! PetahG, you're already into the final... The winner of these two Clowns gets you to deal with! Hahaha... This thread is way too funny. Place your bets....
19.3.2008 09:58 #30
Originally posted by DXR88: Inspired by A B-2 Bomber does that mean with this monitor my illiagle P2P activity will go unnoticed. and does it come with Mach 1 or 2.lol....actually, maybe it monitors your P2P activity, and sends a signal to a B-2 bomber to drop one on your house :P
19.3.2008 11:49 #31
Originally posted by hoip: 1 inch = 2.54cm
hence 1 cm = .40 inch
which = 2/5 of an inch
funni how ppl start being smart asses without even passing primary school maths
nice pics btwWell, to be closer to exact,
1 inch = 2.54cm
therefore, 1cm = .393700787 inches
3/8 cm = .375 inches (.3937008 - .375 = .018)
2/5 cm = .4 inches (.4 - .3937008 = .0062992)
.0062992 is less of a difference that .018.
Therefore 2/5 is the closer approximation...whoever that argument belongs to. I can't even remember.
/walks away and balances beach-ball on nose.
19.3.2008 12:12 #32
Originally posted by Ryu77: r0b0t3ch, it's ok we all know that you are used to quoting things being a little bit larger than they actually are. It's messed up your perspective a little bit... Poor Man.
Has it worked for you yet?
Actually, 3/8(15/40) < 2/5(16/40) , so he can't be "quoting things being a little bit larger than they actually are".Quoting smaller( modesty:~)!)
LOL!! I am from Europe. Moved to the States about 7 years ago. My initial thought about changing from the metric system to the measuring system used here in US- messed up!! This thread actually proves my first thought, we have here people arguing about a difference of 1/40 of an inch - can you even aproximate that with the naked eye?
Yes, 2/5 of an inch is a closer aproximation,on paper, but not the most practical one. I wanna see anyone reading exactly 2/5 of an inch using a ruler/tape measure:~)!
19.3.2008 12:19 #33
All I can say is.....
19.3.2008 12:25 #34
Originally posted by goodswipe: All I can say is.....
At first glance, that picture looked really dirty.
/puts beach-ball down to pull mind out of gutter....
19.3.2008 12:29 #35
Quote:At first glance, that picture looked really dirty.
/puts beach-ball down to pull mind out of gutter....LOL!! I think you might be deprived of ...something! Been naughty and forced to sleep on the couch lately?
19.3.2008 12:32 #36
Originally posted by cyprusrom: Quote:At first glance, that picture looked really dirty.
/puts beach-ball down to pull mind out of gutter....LOL!! I think you might be deprived of ...something! Been naughty and forced to sleep on the couch lately?LOL!
Hmm, funny, I usually have my mind in the gutter and I didn't think it looked bad.
As Borat would say....
"Naughty naughty..."
19.3.2008 12:37 #37
LOL!LOL!! If that were a picture of what emugamer's first thought was(just assuming by the "dirty" associated with the image), that would be probably nympho taken a few steps up!! Honestly, I'd be scared for my boy's integrity!!
19.3.2008 12:44 #38
Originally posted by cyprusrom: LOL!LOL!! If that were a picture of what emugamer's first thought was(just assuming by the "dirty" associated with the image), that would be probably nympho taken a few steps up!! Honestly, I'd be scared for my boy's integrity!!LOL, chomp chomp!
19.3.2008 12:48 #39
Quote:Originally posted by cyprusrom: LOL!LOL!! If that were a picture of what emugamer's first thought was(just assuming by the "dirty" associated with the image), that would be probably nympho taken a few steps up!! Honestly, I'd be scared for my boy's integrity!!LOL, chomp chomp!Ouch X-(
19.3.2008 12:55 #40
@emugamer
Sorry man, couldn't help myself! Didn't intend it in a mean way:~)!
This thread is so much fun! One of the most entertaining flat monitors ever on AD, the BenQ V2400W!
19.3.2008 13:00 #41
Err, I still think it's not thin enough.
19.3.2008 13:04 #42
Originally posted by goodswipe: Err, I still think it's not thin enough.
Yeah, they should make it at least 1/40 inch thinner!!
19.3.2008 13:08 #43
Originally posted by cyprusrom: Originally posted by goodswipe: Err, I still think it's not thin enough.
Yeah, they should make it at least 1/40 inch thinner!!
19.3.2008 13:16 #44
Quote:Originally posted by hoip: 1 inch = 2.54cm
hence 1 cm = .40 inch
which = 2/5 of an inch
funni how ppl start being smart asses without even passing primary school maths
nice pics btwWell, to be closer to exact,
1 inch = 2.54cm
therefore, 1cm = .393700787 inches
3/8 cm = .375 inches (.3937008 - .375 = .018)
2/5 cm = .4 inches (.4 - .3937008 = .0062992)
.0062992 is less of a difference that .018.
Therefore 2/5 is the closer approximation...whoever that argument belongs to. I can't even remember.
/walks away and balances beach-ball on nose.THANK YOU!!!!!!! finally some people agree here with me hahahahha but yeah...I just got pissed how he attacked the guy with how he said his screen wasn't big and then he even made a fool of himself so I'm like you bring out your revolver then I'll bring out my uzi...but no matter..i dont care anymore
19.3.2008 14:35 #45
Quote:Quote:Originally posted by cyprusrom: LOL!LOL!! If that were a picture of what emugamer's first thought was(just assuming by the "dirty" associated with the image), that would be probably nympho taken a few steps up!! Honestly, I'd be scared for my boy's integrity!!LOL, chomp chomp!Ouch X-(Lol....I was actually saying ouch to the thought of actual chomping....
19.3.2008 16:34 #46
Originally posted by cyprusrom: Originally posted by Ryu77: r0b0t3ch, it's ok we all know that you are used to quoting things being a little bit larger than they actually are. It's messed up your perspective a little bit... Poor Man.
Has it worked for you yet?
Actually, 3/8(15/40) < 2/5(16/40) , so he can't be "quoting things being a little bit larger than they actually are".Quoting smaller( modesty:~)!)Psssst... I know that. I already worked that one out. If I said that, the joke wouldn't have quite worked out, would it? I am on your side.... shhhhh. :-P
BTW, this thread is hilarious with an excellent photo gallery. I WANT THIS STICKIED!!!! High five.....
19.3.2008 16:37 #47
/Stickied FTW!!
19.3.2008 17:15 #48
Now we can have more sexy time! We can make a movie film about this thread... And can be the "number 4" best prostit... ummm, thread in all of Kazakhstan!
Nice!
- BORДT
19.3.2008 18:27 #49
Originally posted by emugamer: /walks away and balances beach-ball on nose.
errr errr (<---lame attempt at Seal noise)... Well done emugamer, here's your reward...
Originally posted by DXR88: r0b0t3ch-converting French Canadian to Europein Since 15:44.Maybe emugamer could use this ball instead...
I love this thread! Seriously everytime I look at it... I can't stop the laughter. People at work think I've lost it.
Keep the posts coming guys!
19.3.2008 21:48 #50
hahah u got lots of time at work if you have time to read this lol
19.3.2008 21:51 #51
