Blu-ray successor already in development?

Blu-ray successor already in development?
Researchers from the Tohoku University, in conjunction with Sony have announced the active development of a "blue-violet ultrafast pulsed semiconductor laser" that will be used for disc storage.

Say the researchers: "This latest successful development is an all-semiconductor laser picosecond pulse source with a laser wavelength of 405 nanometers (1 nm = one-billionth of a meter) in the blue-violet region. It is capable of generating optical pulses in the ultrafast duration of 3 picoseconds (1 picosecond = one-trillionth of a second), with ultrahigh output peak power of 100 watts and repetition frequency of 1 gigahertz. Advanced control of the newly-developed and proprietarily-constructed GaN-based mode-locked semiconductor laser and semiconductor optical amplifier have enabled peak output power in excess of 100 watts to be achieved, which is more than a hundred times the world’s highest output value for conventional blue-violet pulse semiconductor lasers."



Additionally, "there are high expectations that this newly-developed semiconductor laser system, which incorporates semiconductor diodes, will be able to be used in a much wider range of applications in the future thanks to technology such as this, which enables the size of devices such as the light source box to be drastically reduced."

Sony says they will use the laser in next-generation disc storage devices, as the laser will allow for discs to hold up to 1TB of storage.

I, for one, would love to have full seasons of television shows on one disc.

Written by: Andre Yoskowitz @ 23 Jul 2010 1:07
Advertisement - News comments available below the ad
  • 20 comments
  • KillerBug

    Wow...1TB...that would be a nice disk format...it isn't like anyone has shown off a 1TB bluray disk...oh wait, they did! I think they even showed off a 100 layer disk with over 2TB of space...and it worked with current bluray players, or at least it worked with an unmodified PS3.

    I guess this makes the 'Ultraviolet' storage locker's name a lot more logical.

    23.7.2010 01:48 #1

  • Josipher

    only thing is this thing can hold a minimum of 1TB..so imagine a 2 TB dual layer

    23.7.2010 02:10 #2

  • KSib

    Not sure what you would use all of the room for. Nearly uncompressed video and audio? A slew of downloadable content already on the disc? That's ridiculous :O

    I could put every digital thing (Games, docs, and a little bit of music is all I have) that I own on one of these.

    23.7.2010 02:43 #3

  • elbald90

    how long will it be until the blank media is cheap enough to be worth buying though ? quite sometime me thinks

    23.7.2010 02:45 #4

  • xboxdvl2

    Originally posted by KSib: Not sure what you would use all of the room for. Nearly uncompressed video and audio? A slew of downloadable content already on the disc? That's ridiculous :O

    I could put every digital thing (Games, docs, and a little bit of music is all I have) that I own on one of these.
    Ive got a 500Gb hdd in my computer and im only using 200GBs.arn't blu-ray movies like 8-15gbs???so probably a few hundred blu-ray movies.plus music,software,data,dvd rips and your kitchen sink LOL

    PS2 with 12 games.
    pc-windows 7,intel core quad Q8400,4 Gb ddr2,WD 500 GB hdd,ATI Radeon HD 4550 graphics,AOC 22inch LCD moniter.

    23.7.2010 03:58 #5

  • VonPepper

    mmmmm big words

    23.7.2010 04:35 #6

  • davidike

    1 tb of data lost due to a tiny scratch and thanks to sony whom are the RIAA, MPAA, IFPI, FACT, CRIA all all the other scum front anti people compaines you were not allowed to make a back up as copying your own content according to Sony is criminal behaviour.

    i think i'll keep passing these scum company offerings n stick to digital distribution until a pro consumer media is produced.. not one designed to remove our rights as the offerings that sony keeps touting..

    "The public domain is a dicgrace to the forces of evil"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo

    23.7.2010 04:39 #7

  • KillerBug

    Originally posted by Josipher: only thing is this thing can hold a minimum of 1TB..so imagine a 2 TB dual layer Quote:Sony says they will use the laser in next-generation disc storage devices, as the laser will allow for discs to hold up to 1TB of storage. That is a maximum of 1TB; not a minimum. Considering BluRay already has a maximum of over 2TB (shown working with current systems), this hardly seems like an advancement.

    Originally posted by KSib: I could put every digital thing (Games, docs, and a little bit of music is all I have) that I own on one of these. Clearly you don't own much digital media. I have about 1TB of "The Simpsons"...and I am no where near a complete collection.

    What else would you use it for? How about seasons 1-10 of a TV show on a single disk? How about QFHD (3840 x 2160) in 3D? That is 8 times the needed bandwidth vs 1080P...or in other words, enough data to fill a DL bluray disk with a single 30 minute clip. I realize that such TVs are very rare and very expensive...but 1080P sets started out rare and expensive, and now you can get one for under $200. It is a given that bluray won't be around forever...and it is going to be a very long time before we see average internet speeds get close to what is needed for bluray quality streaming...so it only makes sense that they are developing (what might be) the last physical disk movie distribution format.

    23.7.2010 04:43 #8

  • DVDBack23

    Originally posted by KillerBug: Originally posted by Josipher: only thing is this thing can hold a minimum of 1TB..so imagine a 2 TB dual layer Quote:Sony says they will use the laser in next-generation disc storage devices, as the laser will allow for discs to hold up to 1TB of storage. That is a maximum of 1TB; not a minimum. Considering BluRay already has a maximum of over 2TB (shown working with current systems), this hardly seems like an advancement.
    I actually may have typoed there in the article, it was unclear whether it was per layer or per disk for the 1TB limit. Will do some research.


    23.7.2010 10:47 #9

  • SProdigy

    Quote:I, for one, would love to have full seasons of television shows on one disc. Didn't Blu-Ray promise that? ;-)

    I wonder how long it would take to burn these discs? A week?

    23.7.2010 11:10 #10

  • SuckRaven

    A pulse every 3 picoseconds means this semiconductor laser has a frequency of 333333333333 Hz, or 333 GHz, or .333 THz. Cool.

    SuckRaven

    23.7.2010 11:30 #11

  • KillerBug

    Originally posted by SProdigy: Quote:I, for one, would love to have full seasons of television shows on one disc. Didn't Blu-Ray promise that? ;-)

    I wonder how long it would take to burn these discs? A week?
    They said it would be possible, but in practice, it hasn't been done too much because it is harder to charge $60 for the season when it is just one disk of SD content. For personal use, you can often put a whole season on one bluray...and if these disks really do start at 1tb, you could put 10-12 seasons of a show onto a single disk. Just don't expect to see 20 seasons of a show on 2 violetrays for sale at bestbuy.

    23.7.2010 13:04 #12

  • andmill11

    Originally posted by KillerBug: Originally posted by Josipher: only thing is this thing can hold a minimum of 1TB..so imagine a 2 TB dual layer Quote:Sony says they will use the laser in next-generation disc storage devices, as the laser will allow for discs to hold up to 1TB of storage. That is a maximum of 1TB; not a minimum. Considering BluRay already has a maximum of over 2TB (shown working with current systems), this hardly seems like an advancement.

    Originally posted by KSib: I could put every digital thing (Games, docs, and a little bit of music is all I have) that I own on one of these. Clearly you don't own much digital media. I have about 1TB of "The Simpsons"...and I am no where near a complete collection.

    What else would you use it for? How about seasons 1-10 of a TV show on a single disk? How about QFHD (3840 x 2160) in 3D? That is 8 times the needed bandwidth vs 1080P...or in other words, enough data to fill a DL bluray disk with a single 30 minute clip. I realize that such TVs are very rare and very expensive...but 1080P sets started out rare and expensive, and now you can get one for under $200. It is a given that bluray won't be around forever...and it is going to be a very long time before we see average internet speeds get close to what is needed for bluray quality streaming...so it only makes sense that they are developing (what might be) the last physical disk movie distribution format.
    Please all knowing killerbug show me where I can get a 1080p t.v for under $200

    23.7.2010 15:43 #13

  • DXR88

    Mace windu Agrees Purple laz0rs are Da Shnit.

    Powered By

    23.7.2010 17:27 #14

  • KillerBug

    Originally posted by andmill11: Please all knowing killerbug show me where I can get a 1080p t.v for under $200 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824254050

    24.7.2010 00:32 #15

  • Bucknekid

    How mad would you be burning a full 1TB disc and in the final stages you created a coaster? I can only imagine what blank media will cost when first brought to market.

    24.7.2010 01:56 #16

  • KillerBug

    Originally posted by Bucknekid: How mad would you be burning a full 1TB disc and in the final stages you created a coaster? I can only imagine what blank media will cost when first brought to market. HEHE...yeah, that would suck big time...but what would be even worse? How about if you moved all your home movies to one violetray...and then it got cracked.

    I'm sure blank violetrays will start out at least as overpriced as blank blurays started...so expensive that you can get the same space from high speed hard drives for less money.

    24.7.2010 05:50 #17

  • dbminter

    Originally posted by Bucknekid: How mad would you be burning a full 1TB disc and in the final stages you created a coaster?
    I can still remember the days of 1x DVD burning. Where you'd get into 59 minutes of a 60 minute burn and it would crap out due to some buffer underrun error. So, you lost a then expensive DVD-R, you lost 59 minutes, and at least an additional 60 minutes to reburn the failed attempt.

    2.8.2010 15:26 #18

  • uadua

    Nothing like putting all your eggs in one basket.

    2.8.2010 18:14 #19

  • Mez

    Originally posted by xboxdvl2: Originally posted by KSib: Not sure what you would use all of the room for. Nearly uncompressed video and audio? A slew of downloadable content already on the disc? That's ridiculous :O

    I could put every digital thing (Games, docs, and a little bit of music is all I have) that I own on one of these.
    Ive got a 500Gb hdd in my computer and im only using 200GBs.arn't blu-ray movies like 8-15gbs???so probably a few hundred blu-ray movies.plus music,software,data,dvd rips and your kitchen sink LOL
    You can compress them down to about 10 Gb. So your disk would hold 50 not 100.

    2.8.2010 23:22 #20

© 2024 AfterDawn Oy

Hosted by
Powered by UpCloud